WEB 2.0 LINKS
Select Category 911 (1) Aboriginals (7) Abu Grahib (1) Advertising (1) Afghan education (47) Afghan families and women (47) Afghan funds (49) Afghan peace (45) Afghan Youth (185) Afghanistan (448) Politics (69) Afghanistan opium (14) Afghanistan security forces (54) Afghanistan withdrawing (42) Afghans and water (20) Africa (69) Africa and drought (23) Africa famine (8) Africa land grab (24) Ahmadinejad (8) Aid (1) AIPAC (6) Air war (60) Al Gore (1) Al Jazeera (19) Al Qaeda (132) Amazon logging (1) Anarchism (60) animals (1) anti Muslim thought (1) anti zion protests (17) antiwar.com (38) Arab democracy (52) Arab Jews (30) Arab movements (52) Arab Spring (121) Arctic drilling (1) Armageddon (12) Art and general issues (15) Asia (7) Asia Times (4) Assange (28) Assassination (34) Atheism (1) Atomics Corporation (34) Atwan (37) Atzmon (31) Austerity (13) Austerity the people’s medicine (1) Australia (236) Australia and Abu Grahib (13) Australia and crimes against the indigenous (66) Australia and support it gives to Afghan war crimes (100) Australia and the imperial project (82) Australia Coal Country and Uranium and metals (66) Australia Politics (238) Australia the true friend downunder (16) Australian complicity in international war crimes (95) Australian complicity in US warmongering policies and war crimes (152) Australian economy (158) Australian Foreign Policy (230) Australian Politics (330) Australian presence is the the Rudd dream (124) Australian support for Zionism (78) Australian War Crimes (18) Avnery (11) Bahrain (51) Bakunin (10) Baltzer (4) Bangladesh (4) BBC (10) BDS (6) Berlusconi (1) Bicycles as an alternative (1) Big Pharma (1) Billionaire and corporate humanity (1) Bin Laden (127) Biofuels (2) Bolivia (10) BP (11) Bradley Manning (34) BRIC (6) Bukowski (3) Burma (17) Cambodia (4) Canada (3) Capital (552) Capital Project (500) capital project Chomsky views (5) Capitalism (562) Capitalism and debt (250) Capitalism for Zombies (50) Carbon Tax (27) Chavez (1) Chevron (1) Children in Palestine and Gaza (24) China (50) China News Service (6) Chomsky (92) Chomsky and Islam and the US (24) Chomsky article (37) Chomsky on Bin Laden (22) Chomsky opinion (39) Chomsky views reasoning (27) CIA (141) civil liberty (42) Climate (144) Climate change (276) Climate denial (116) Coal (22) Collective Military Irrelevance (6) Colombia (3) Comedy (2) Commentators (21) Consent (37) Corporate greed and excess (18) corporate rule (1) Corporatocracy (1) Counterpunch (16) Cuba (10) D Room (15) debate and discussion (140) Debt Crisis (41) Debt sham (38) Democracy (481) Democracy in Asia (30) Democracy in the Arab World (161) Democracy Now! (22) Diabetes (2) Dictators (113) Dirty Energy (43) disaster (85) Dissent (162) Drug Company Dependence (13) Drug Taking (1) E coli (2) economic measures (180) Economics (204) Economy (204) Education (96) Egypt (136) El Salvador (1) elections (131) Elites (231) Emails (2) Emma Goldmann (10) Englehardt (7) Environment (259) Environment and climate (121) Environmental activist (117) Erdogan (6) Escobar (38) Escobar Escobar opinion thoughts (18) European (73) European debt Italy Greece (17) European Foreign Policy (80) Eurozone (1) Evolution (5) Fascism (213) Fatah (66) Fisk (11) Flotilla Flytilla (9) Food (23) Foreign Policy (137) Fossil fuel (40) Fox News (12) Fracking (6) Fukushima (12) G8 (7) Galeano (9) Gas Mining (9) Gaza (258) Genocide (53) Germany (19) Germany new old politics (19) Gillard (58) Gillard and Labor; Masters of the Australian Crawl (32) Gitmo (45) Gitmo disclosures (29) Global capitalism and imperialism (52) Global Food System (24) Golan Heights (13) Goldstone (27) Greec and Israel brothers in arms (4) Greece (53) Greece and debt (25) Greece and Stock Market (11) Greece and the Arab Spring and Palestine Gaza (25) Greece and the Flotilla (17) Guantanamo Bay a human disaster (33) Guantanamo crimes (35) Guardian (59) Hacking response is to shoot (1) Hamas (91) Health (20) Heart Disease (7) Hezbollah (4) Hillary (90) Honduras (6) Human Rights (113) Ilan Pappe (2) illegal immigrants (1) IMF (42) immigration (9) Imperial Project (480) Imperial Project Chomsky views (6) Imperialism (469) India (30) Indigenous (47) Indigenous Australians (16) Internet a war domain (1) Intifada (8) Iran (114) Iraq (130) Ireland (2) Irrevelavance (5) Islam (19) Islam and Chomsky (2) Islam and the US (89) Isolationism (6) Israel (959) Israel a Jewish State dealing in arms (71) Israel a state of settlers (289) Israel and AIPAC (241) Israel and diaspora forces of crime (405) Israel and force (416) Israel and oil (210) Israel and the settlers (381) Israel and withholding resources from the Arabs etc (82) Israel and zionist moral crimes (398) Israel apartheid (129) Israel Boycott (259) Israel death and destruction (372) Israel diaspora and deceit (222) Israel expulsion (316) Israel hasbara (71) Israel lobby and what it can do (290) Israel media (89) Israel West Bank (43) Israel’s wall (266) Israeli checkpoints (280) Italy (1) Ivory Coast (19) Ivory Coast people’s protests (4) Ivory Coast Warlords (4) James Murdoch (44) Japan (74) Japan Nuclear (38) Jason Ditz (13) Jerusalem (7) Jewish newspapers (4) Jewishness (9) Jordan (19) Journalism (10) Kashmir (5) Kenya (1) Koran (5) Kosovo (8) Kropotkin (2) Labor (41) Labor Prty as a crime (7) Lebanon (6) Leon Panetta (68) Lettiong the children suffer an Australian way (4) Libya (402) Malalai Joya (7) Manufacturing Consent (44) May Day (1) Media (112) Media distortion (24) Media manipulation (24) Medical killing fields (1) melt down (15) Merkel (1) MI 6 (14) Middle East (678) Militants (289) Military (438) Military madmen (402) Military Murders (299) Mining (2) Miscarriage of Justice (35) Mission Creep (287) Monbiot (33) Mothers vote (5) Multiculturalism (2) Myanmar (2) Nakba (31) Naomi Klein (6) NATO (183) Nature (2) Negotiate. It’s now or never (91) Netanyahu (61) News (142) News Corp (96) News hacking (83) News international (94) News of the World (117) news report (117) Newsweek (7) Nigeria (11) Nigeria oil (12) Norway (38) nuclear (107) Nuclear Germany (11) Nuclear weapons (32) Obama (311) Obama regime (63) Obama warmonger (288) Occupy movement (55) oil (314) oil and gas resources (271) Oil in the USA (130) Oil spill (11) Operation Cast Lead (5) OWS protests (1) Pakistan (103) Pakistan and war and unrest (98) Palestine (368) Palestine Authority (104) Palestine UN bid (107) Parliament (18) Peace Movement (92) Peak oil (45) Pentagon (89) People’s action (2) people’s protests (109) Personal (190) Photos (1) Pilger (11) police (8) Police forces and Middle East (16) Police state (1) Police the public and oppression at work (4) Political psychopaths (63) political self satisfaction (8) pollution (4) Portugal (6) Poverty (8) powers of arrest (3) Predator Drone (101) President of the World (150) Propaganda (401) Protest (103) Protests (163) Psycopaths (238) Qaddafi (83) Racism (103) radiation (5) Rafah Crossing (1) Raimondo (1) Ramzy Baroud (5) Ras-Al-Amud (1) Ray McGovern (8) Reader’s contribution (1) Real News (4) RealNews (4) Rebekah Brooks (43) Refugees (36) Regulating Democracy (29) Resistance (1) Resource Wars (14) Right of return (22) Right to return (24) Right Wing (12) Rudd (21) Rudolf Rocker (16) Rupert Murdoch (119) Rupert not born in the USA (28) Russia (21) Sabrosky (5) Sanctions (1) Saudi Arabia (42) Science (2) Scientific madness (11) Scientific psychopaths (12) Sea Levels (2) Second Flotilla to Gaza (5) sexual assault (2) Slovenia (3) Slut walk (4) Somali (7) Somalia (17) Somalia children and famine (6) Somalia refugee camps (11) Sonia Shah (1) South America (6) South Sudan (6) Spain (4) Special Ops (29) Spending Cuts (5) Spies (4) Standard and Poors (3) Stateless socialism (11) Stiglitz (1) Stock market (1) Sudan (18) Sustainable fishing is an oxymoron (3) Swanson (35) Syria (114) Syria conflict (56) Syria repression and violence (56) Syria sanctions (70) Taliban (13) Tar sands (5) teaching (3) Ted Rall (4) Terrorism (7) Thai Cambodia disputes (2) Thailand (1) The Fourth Reich (4) the Pope (1) The Real News (2) Timor (9) Tom Dispatch (9) torture (109) Torture and Human Rights (19) Torture and Rumsfeld (9) Torture as an aid to memory loss (23) Torture prosecution (12) Torture rules ok (21) torture works better than drugs (22) Torturers are true Americans (28) Tunisia (28) Turkey (38) Uganda (11) Uganda peotests (7) UK (372) UK DPP (49) UK fascism (132) UK Foreign Policy (265) UK Monarchy (80) UK riots (32) UK riots and unrest (59) UK riots Cameron gets it wrong (20) Ukraine (4) UN (140) Uncategorized (1674) Unemployment (5) University education (2) Uri Avnery (7) US and syphilis (4) US economy (623) US elections (643) US Foreign Policy (828) US life and the military (79) US Politics (970) US public opinion (296) US torture; art and science (243) US war crimes (574) USA (785) Vandana (2) Video (19) voodoo rhythm economics (459) War (834) War and economics (292) War child victims (65) War Chomsky views (14) War creates misery and despair (165) War Crimes (796) War criminals all types (156) War is a crime (770) War means war (235) War no reason needed (199) War on drugs (210) War on Islam and Muslims (43) War on terror (333) war with Iran (5) Water (2) water waste (1) Waterboarding (164) Wikileaks (157) Women abuse and targetting (54) Women and discrimination (42) Women and rape and sexual assault (29) Women and revolution (49) Women become tragerts (59) Women in the Middle East (67) Women’s issues (96) Womens’ views and action (130) WTO (2) Xenophobia (1) Yemen (33) Zawahiri (4) zionism (15) Zizek (1)
- The Saudis would have us all believe in a never ending Saudi summer | ikners.comon The most corrupt regime in the Middle East threatens to get nuclear warheads.
- UK downplaying Fukushima is good for nuclear business | ikners.com on Problems around Fukushima.
- The use of vacuums | ikners.com on The money missing in Iraq
- The benefits of a quick cheap fix to fix the cheap quick fix | ikners.com onPossible melt through at Fukushima
- The benefits of a quick cheap fix to fix the cheap quick fix | ikners.com onProblems around Fukushima.
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- October 2006
- July 2004
- April 2004
US: Edging closer towards war with Iran? The biggest problem for the US is not Iran getting a nuclear weapon and testing it, but getting it and not using it.
Suddenly the struggle to stop Iran is not about saving Israel from nuclear annihilation. After a decade of scare-mongering about the second coming of Nazi Germany, the Iran hawks are admitting that they have other reasons for wanting to take out Iran, and saving Israeli lives may not be one of them. Suddenly the neo-conservatives have discovered the concept of truth-telling, although, no doubt, the shift will be ephemeral.
The shift in the rationale for war was kicked off this week when Danielle Pletka, head of the American Enterprise Institute‘s (AEI) foreign policy shop and one of the most prominent neo-conservatives in Washington, explained what the current obsession with Iran’s nuclear programme is all about:
The biggest problem for the United States is not Iran getting a nuclear weapon and testing it, it’s Iran getting a nuclear weapon and not using it. Because the second that they have one and they don’t do anything bad, all of the naysayers are going to come back and say, “See, we told you Iran is a responsible power. We told you Iran wasn’t getting nuclear weapons in order to use them immediately.” … And they will eventually define Iran with nuclear weapons as not a problem.
Hold on. The “biggest problem” with Iran getting a nuclear weapon is not that Iranians will use it, but that they won’t use it and that they might behave like a “responsible power”? But what about the hysteria about a second Holocaust? What about Prime Minister Netanyahu’s assertion that this is 1938 and Hitler is on the march? What about all of these pronouncements that Iran must be prevented from developing a nuclear weapon because the apocalypticmullahs would happily commit national suicide in order to destroy Israel? And what about AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) and its satellites, which produce one sanctions bill after another (all dutifully passed by Congress) because of the “existential threat” that Iran poses to Israel? Did Pletka lose her talking points?
Pletka’s “never mind” about the imminent danger of an Iranian bomb seems to be the new line from the bastion of neo-conservativism.
Earlier this week, one of Pletka’s colleagues at AEI said pretty much the same thing. Writing in theWeekly Standard, Thomas Donnelly explained that we’ve got the Iran problem all wrong and that we need to “understand the nature of the conflict.” He continued:
We’re fixated on the Iranian nuclear programme while the Tehran regime has its eyes on the real prize: the balance of power in the Persian Gulf and the greater Middle East.
This admission that the problem with a nuclear Iran is not that it would attack Israel, but that it would alter the regional balance of power is incredibly significant. The American Enterprise Institute is notCommentary, the Republican Jewish Coalition, or the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, which are not exactly known for their intellectual heft.
It is, along with the Heritage Foundation, the most influential conservative think-tank. That is why it was able to play such an influential role in promoting the invasion of Iraq. Take a look at this page from the AEI website from January 2002 (featuring, no surprise, a head shot of Richard Perle). It is announcing one of an almost endless series of events designed to instigate war with Iraq, a war that did not begin for another 14 months. (Perle himself famously began promoting a war with Iraq within days of 9/11, according to former CIA director George Tenet.) AEI’s drumbeat for war was incessant, finally meeting with success in March 2003.
And now they are doing it again. On Monday, Republican Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois – AIPAC’s favourite senator – will keynote an event at AEI, with Pletka and Donnelly offering responses. It will be moderated by Fred Kagan, another AEI fellow and Iraq (now Iran) war hawk. The event is built on the premise that “ongoing efforts to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons have failed”.
We all know what that means. AEI will, no doubt, continue to host these “it’s time for war” events through 2012 and beyond, or until President Obama or his successor announces either that the US has attacked Iran or that Israel has attacked and we are at her side.
If you didn’t know any better, you might ask why – given that Pletka and Donnelly are downgrading the Iranian nuclear threat – AEI is still hell-bent on war. If its determination to stop Iran is not about defending Israel from an “existential threat”, what is it truly about?
Fortunately, Pletka and Donnelly don’t leave us guessing. It is about preserving the regional balance of power, which means ensuring that Israel remains the region’s military powerhouse, with Saudi Arabia playing a supporting role. That requires overthrowing the Iranian regime and replacing it with one that will do our bidding (like the Shah) and will not, in any way, prevent Israel from operating with a free reign throughout the region.
This goal can only be achieved through outside intervention (war), because virtually, the entire Iranian population – from the hardliners in the reactionary regime to reformists in the Green Movement working for a more open society – are united in support of Iran’s right to develop its nuclear potential and to be free of outside interference. What the neo-conservatives want is a pliant government in Tehran, just like we used to have, and the only way to achieve this, they believe, is through war.
At this point, it appears that they may get their wish. The only alternative to war is diplomacy, and diplomacy, unlike war, seems to be no longer on the table.
At a fascinating Israel Policy Forum (IPF) this week, Barbara Slavin, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and alongtime journalist and author who specialises on Iran, noted that the Obama administration has spent a grand total of 45 minutes in direct engagement with the Iranians. Forty-five minutes! Just as bad, the administration no longer makes any effort to engage.
This is crazy. Of course, there is no way of knowing if the Iranian regime wants to talk, but what is the harm of trying? If they say no, they say no. If we talk and the talks go nowhere, then at least we tried. But we won’t try out of fear of antagonising campaign donors who have been told that the alternative to war is the destruction of Israel. (Thanks to those same donors, Congress is utterly hopeless on this issue.)
So, instead of pursuing diplomacy, we are inching closer toward war.
At IPF, Slavin predicted what the collateral results of an attack on Iran would be:
What’s the collateral damage? Oh my lord. Well, you destroy the reform movement in Iran for another generation because people will rally around the government; inevitably they do when country is attacked.
People always talk about the Iranians being so irrational and wanting martyrdom. That’s bull. They’re perfectly happy to fight to the last Arab suicide bomber. But they don’t put their own lives on the line unless their country is attacked.
So, you know, they would rally around the government and that would destroy the reform movement. And of course the price of oil would spike. The Iranians will find ways to retaliate through their partners like Hezbollah and Hamas. I think the Israelis would have to attack Lebanon first, to take out Hezbollah’s 40,000 rockets. It’s not just a matter of a quick few hops over Saudi Arabia and you hit Natanz, you know, and a few other places.
That’s why the Israelis want the United States to do it, because they can’t do it, frankly. The US does it? Okay, the remaining US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are sitting ducks. Iran is already playing footsie with the Taliban in Afghanistan. That will become much more pronounced. They will perhaps attack the Saudi oil fields.
Slavin continues, but the point is clear. An Iran war would make the Iraq war look like the “cakewalk” neo-conservatives promised it would be.
And for what? To preserve the regional balance of power? How many American lives is that worth? Or Israeli lives? Or Iranian? (It is worth noting that this week, Max Boot, the Council on Foreign Relations’ main neo-con, wrote that an attack on Iran, which he advocates, would only delay development of an Iranian bomb.)
Nonetheless, at this point war looks likely. Under our political system, the side that can pay for election campaigns invariably gets what it wants. There is, simply put, no group of donors who are supporting candidates for president and Congress based on their opposition to war, while millions of organised dollars are available to those who support the neo-con agenda. Pundits used to say: As Maine goes, so goes the country. It’s just as simple today: As the money goes, so goes our policy.
MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Action Network.
A version of this article first appeared on Foreign Policy Matters.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.
Foreign Policy Matters